Clinical
Measuring accommodative facility in clinical practice
In this article:
First published December 11, 2015
Updated March 6, 2026
In this article, we describe the relationship between accommodation and myopia, cover the basics of accommodative facility and its applications, and explain two ways to measure accommodative facility in the clinic setting.
Role of accommodation in childhood myopia
Given the longstanding view of near work as an environmental risk factor for myopia development and progression,
Research suggests that esophoria and increased accommodative lag are associated with myopia compared to emmetropia.
As myopia development and progression is multifactorial, assessing accommodation and binocular vision contributes an important layer to clinical decision making.
Learn more about how to measure accommodative lag, and prescribing add powers for patients with accommodative lag.
What is accommodative facility?
Accommodative facility is a clinical test that evaluates the eye’s ability to alter accommodation rapidly and accurately, by using alternating negative and positive lenses to induce and relax accommodation.
It can be measured either monocularly (monocular accommodative facility, MAF) or binocularly (binocular accommodative facility, BAF).
Whereas MAF provides a direct evaluation of the accommodative response, BAF reflects the combined response of the accommodation and vergence systems.
Why should we measure accommodative facility?
Measuring accommodative facility is relevant for diagnosis of accommodative infacility, also known as inertia of accommodation or tonic accommodation. Accommodative infacility is characterised by sluggish accommodative responses between distance and near, often leading to intermittent blurred vision and/or asthenopia, in relation to prolonged near work.
Moreover, testing the facility of accommodation is useful for predicting visual discomfort as well as academic success in school children.
A key advantage for myopia management is that testing can be performed on children around the typical age of myopia onset (i.e. 5–6 years), as the test is quick, non-invasive, easy for children to understand, and reproducible. With age-appropriate targets and instructions, both monocular and binocular accommodative facility have been successfully measured in children aged 6–12 years.
Assessing accommodation and binocular vision – such as accommodative facility, has an important role in routine clinical care, beyond potential associations with myopia. In myopic patients, these disorders should be managed to support visual comfort and function, irrespective of their impact on myopia progression.
How to measure accommodative facility (#1)
Accommodative facility testing can be performed qualitatively by observing the patient’s response times as well as their behaviour while interacting with the positive and negative lenses.
Method
- Provide the patient with a near chart containing N6 or smaller letters, positioned at their habitual working distance of 33 to 40 cm. Alternative accommodative targets may also be used, such as the top of an occluder paddle with descending letter sizes or the back of a Howell phoria card.
- Prepare ±1.50 and ±2.00 flippers, combining the minus sides to create a -3.50 D demand. If lens flippers are unavailable, loose trial lenses may be used instead
- With full distance correction in place, ask the patient to view the target through the -3.50 D lenses. The patient should be able to clear the target to a level consistent with their expected positive relative accommodation (PRA) or B- result. This provides a quick qualitative indication of accommodative amplitude response.
- Next, switch to the plus lenses of the ±2.00 flippers, creating a +2.00 D demand. The patient should again be able to clear the target to a level consistent with their expected negative relative accommodation (NRA) or B+ result.
- Finally, alternate several times between +2.00 and -2.00 lenses, observing the speed and consistency of clearing. Note whether fatigue occurs on either side or whether rapid clearing is maintained throughout the cycles.
Qualitative observations can be recorded like the example below:
- "Acc fac normal" - if both -3.50, +2.00 and -2.00 are cleared swiftly and consistently
- "Acc fac normal on plus, slow on -3.50, fatigues to fail on -2"
- "Acc fac normal on plus, failed -3.50, cleared -2 on cycles"
If patient #2 or #3 has an accommodative lag over +1.00, accommodative facility testing gives useful insight into how much functional reserve they have to cope with that lag. Patient #2 is likely to struggle more than patient 3, as they demonstrate an initial ability to stimulate accommodation that could not be sustained, whereas patient #3 showed a consistently reduced but more stable accommodative response, clearing -2.00.
How to measure accommodative facility (#2)
The most common method of accommodative facility testing is the quantitative method, where the clinician counts the number of successful cycles that the patient is able to clear within one minute.
Method
A hand-held ± 2.00 D lens flipper or a phoropter can be used.
A pair of positive and negative flips is considered as one cycle, and the number of cycles completed in one minute (cpm) is recorded by the practitioner.
In children aged 6–12 years, the normative values can vary by age, as older children may be able to achieve a greater number of cycles. With ± 2.00 D flippers, the mean expected values for MAF and BAF have been reported as 5.5–7 cpm and 3–5 cpm, respectively.
For patients aged 18–30 years using ± 2.00 D flippers, the expected values for MAF and BAF are approximately 11 cpm and 8 cpm, respectively.
Key points
- Accommodative facility indicates the ability of the visual system to adjust accommodation quickly and accurately.
- Testing accommodative facility under monocular or binocular viewing conditions helps predict visual comfort and functional performance, particularly in relation to sustained near work.
- While facility of accommodation is traditionally measured by counting cycles per minute, observing the patient’s subjective response to lenses can provide additional insights into their accommodative system.
Want to learn more about binocular vision?
Discover our Binocular Vision Fundamentals online course – designed to build your confidence and clinical precision in assessing and managing BV.
You’ll learn our practical two-system approach to accommodation and vergence, step through key diagnostic tests, and refine your prescribing and management decisions. The course also explores how to communicate BV findings with patients and why BV is essential in myopia management – always with a sharp focus on clinical application.
Enjoy video demonstrations, real-world case examples, and downloadable chairside infographics you can use immediately in practice.
Meet the Authors:
About Kate Gifford
Dr Kate Gifford is an internationally renowned clinician-scientist optometrist and peer educator, and a Visiting Research Fellow at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. She holds a PhD in contact lens optics in myopia, four professional fellowships, over 100 peer reviewed and professional publications, and has presented almost 300 conference lectures around the world. Kate is the Chair of the Clinical Management Guidelines Committee of the International Myopia Institute. In 2016 Kate co-founded Myopia Profile with Dr Paul Gifford; the world-leading educational platform on childhood myopia management. After 13 years of clinical practice ownership, Kate now works full time on Myopia Profile.
References
- Ip JM, Saw SM, Rose KA, et al. Role of near work in myopia: findings in a sample of Australian school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Jul 2008;49(7):2903-10. [link]
- Drobe B, de Saint-André R. The pre-myopic syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. Sep 1995;15(5):375-8. [link]
- Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, et al. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Jpn J Ophthalmol. Jan 2026;49(3):189-94. [link]
- Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, et al. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. May 1995;35(9):1299-304. [link]
- Harb EN, Thorn F, Troilo D. Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes. Vision Res. Aug 2006;46(16):2581-92. [link]
- Allen PM, O'Leary DJ. Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error. Vision Res. Feb 2006;46(4):491-505. [link]
- Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci. Apr 2005;82(4):273-8. [link]
- García A, Cacho P, Lara F, et al. The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. Mar 2000;20(2):98-104. [link]
- Balke M, Skjöld G, Lundmark PO. Comparison of Short-Term Effects of Treatment of Accommodative Infacility with Low Plus Addition in Single Vision Rx or Vision Therapy: A Pilot Study. Clin Optom (Auckl). Mar 2026;14:83-92. [link]
- Kiely PM, Crewther SG, Crewther DP. Is there an association between functional vision and learning to read?. Clin Exp Optom. Nov 2001;84(6):346-353. [link]
- Kedzia B, Tondel G, Pieczyrak D, et al. Accommodative facility test results and academic success in Polish second graders. J Am Optom Assoc. Feb 1999;70(2):110-6. [link]
- Allen PM, Charman WN, Radhakrishnan H. Changes in dynamics of accommodation after accommodative facility training in myopes and emmetropes. Vision Res. May 2010;50(10):947-55. [link]
- Scheiman M, Herzberg H, Frantz K, et al. Normative study of accommodative facility in elementary schoolchildren. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. Feb 1988;65(2):127-34. [link]
- Jiménez R, González MD, Pérez MA, et al. Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. Mar 2003;23(2):97-107. [link]
- Zellers JA, Alpert TL, Rouse MW. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Assoc. Jan 1984;55(1):31-7. [link]
Enormous thanks to our visionary sponsors
Myopia Profile’s growth into a world leading platform has been made possible through the support of our visionary sponsors, who share our mission to improve children’s vision care worldwide. Click on their logos to learn about how these companies are innovating and developing resources with us to support you in managing your patients with myopia.