Myopia Profile

Clinical

Measuring accommodative facility in clinical practice

Posted on December 11th 2015 by Kate Gifford

In this article:

First published December 11, 2015
Updated March 6, 2026

In this article, we describe the relationship between accommodation and myopia, cover the basics of accommodative facility and its applications, and explain two ways to measure accommodative facility in the clinic setting.


Role of accommodation in childhood myopia

Given the longstanding view of near work as an environmental risk factor for myopia development and progression,1 many studies have explored the relationship between accommodation and myopia

Research suggests that esophoria and increased accommodative lag are associated with myopia compared to emmetropia.2,3 Myopic children and young adults show reduced response to lens-induced blur, reduced accommodative facility, greater variability in accommodative behaviour, and greater accommodative convergence (higher AC/A ratios) relative to emmetropes.4-7 Higher accommodative lag may be also seen in individuals who undergo myopic shifts, regardless of whether they were originally myopic or non-myopic.6

As myopia development and progression is multifactorial, assessing accommodation and binocular vision contributes an important layer to clinical decision making.

Information

What is accommodative facility?

Accommodative facility is a clinical test that evaluates the eye’s ability to alter accommodation rapidly and accurately, by using alternating negative and positive lenses to induce and relax accommodation. 

It can be measured either monocularly (monocular accommodative facility, MAF) or binocularly (binocular accommodative facility, BAF)

Whereas MAF provides a direct evaluation of the accommodative response, BAF reflects the combined response of the accommodation and vergence systems.8

Why should we measure accommodative facility?

Measuring accommodative facility is relevant for diagnosis of accommodative infacility, also known as inertia of accommodation or tonic accommodation. Accommodative infacility is characterised by sluggish accommodative responses between distance and near, often leading to intermittent blurred vision and/or asthenopia, in relation to prolonged near work.9

Moreover, testing the facility of accommodation is useful for predicting visual discomfort as well as academic success in school children.10,11 Accommodative facility can indicate how well a patient can cope with accommodative lag, and how much stamina they have to maintain near point focus. For example, low facility of accommodation is used a diagnostic sign for accommodative insufficiency.12

A key advantage for myopia management is that testing can be performed on children around the typical age of myopia onset (i.e. 5–6 years), as the test is quick, non-invasive, easy for children to understand, and reproducible. With age-appropriate targets and instructions, both monocular and binocular accommodative facility have been successfully measured in children aged 6–12 years.13,14

Assessing accommodation and binocular vision – such as accommodative facility, has an important role in routine clinical care, beyond potential associations with myopia. In myopic patients, these disorders should be managed to support visual comfort and function, irrespective of their impact on myopia progression.

How to measure accommodative facility (#1)

Accommodative facility testing can be performed qualitatively by observing the patient’s response times as well as their behaviour while interacting with the positive and negative lenses.

89305001-7e47-4b0b-dc2e-08db05a51ff9.jpg

Method

  1. Provide the patient with a near chart containing N6 or smaller letters, positioned at their habitual working distance of 33 to 40 cm. Alternative accommodative targets may also be used, such as the top of an occluder paddle with descending letter sizes or the back of a Howell phoria card.
  2. Prepare ±1.50 and ±2.00 flippers, combining the minus sides to create a -3.50 D demand. If lens flippers are unavailable, loose trial lenses may be used instead
  3. With full distance correction in place, ask the patient to view the target through the -3.50 D lenses. The patient should be able to clear the target to a level consistent with their expected positive relative accommodation (PRA) or B- result. This provides a quick qualitative indication of accommodative amplitude response.
  4. Next, switch to the plus lenses of the ±2.00 flippers, creating a +2.00 D demand. The patient should again be able to clear the target to a level consistent with their expected negative relative accommodation (NRA) or B+ result.
  5. Finally, alternate several times between +2.00 and -2.00 lenses, observing the speed and consistency of clearing. Note whether fatigue occurs on either side or whether rapid clearing is maintained throughout the cycles.

Qualitative observations can be recorded like the example below:

  1. "Acc fac normal" - if both -3.50, +2.00 and -2.00 are cleared swiftly and consistently
  2. "Acc fac normal on plus, slow on -3.50, fatigues to fail on -2"
  3. "Acc fac normal on plus, failed -3.50, cleared -2 on cycles"

If patient #2 or #3 has an accommodative lag over +1.00, accommodative facility testing gives useful insight into how much functional reserve they have to cope with that lag. Patient #2 is likely to struggle more than patient 3, as they demonstrate an initial ability to stimulate accommodation that could not be sustained, whereas patient #3 showed a consistently reduced but more stable accommodative response, clearing -2.00.

How to measure accommodative facility (#2)

The most common method of accommodative facility testing is the quantitative method, where the clinician counts the number of successful cycles that the patient is able to clear within one minute.

Method

A hand-held ± 2.00 D lens flipper or a phoropter can be used.15 Viewing through one side of the lens flipper, the patient is instructed to hold a near chart at 40 cm and clear one row of reduced Snellen print – i.e. fixate on the print until it becomes clear and single. As soon as the print is readable, the lenses are flipped to the opposite site and the patient is instructed to clear the print again. 

A pair of positive and negative flips is considered as one cycle, and the number of cycles completed in one minute (cpm) is recorded by the practitioner.

Information

In children aged 6–12 years, the normative values can vary by age, as older children may be able to achieve a greater number of cycles. With ± 2.00 D flippers, the mean expected values for MAF and BAF have been reported as 5.5–7 cpm and 3–5 cpm, respectively.13

For patients aged 18–30 years using ± 2.00 D flippers, the expected values for MAF and BAF are approximately 11 cpm and 8 cpm, respectively.15 

Key points

  1. Accommodative facility indicates the ability of the visual system to adjust accommodation quickly and accurately.
  2. Testing accommodative facility under monocular or binocular viewing conditions helps predict visual comfort and functional performance, particularly in relation to sustained near work.
  3. While facility of accommodation is traditionally measured by counting cycles per minute, observing the patient’s subjective response to lenses can provide additional insights into their accommodative system.

Want to learn more about binocular vision?

Discover our Binocular Vision Fundamentals online course – designed to build your confidence and clinical precision in assessing and managing BV. 

You’ll learn our practical two-system approach to accommodation and vergence, step through key diagnostic tests, and refine your prescribing and management decisions. The course also explores how to communicate BV findings with patients and why BV is essential in myopia management – always with a sharp focus on clinical application.

Enjoy video demonstrations, real-world case examples, and downloadable chairside infographics you can use immediately in practice. 


Meet the Authors:

About Kate Gifford

Dr Kate Gifford is an internationally renowned clinician-scientist optometrist and peer educator, and a Visiting Research Fellow at Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. She holds a PhD in contact lens optics in myopia, four professional fellowships, over 100 peer reviewed and professional publications, and has presented almost 300 conference lectures around the world. Kate is the Chair of the Clinical Management Guidelines Committee of the International Myopia Institute. In 2016 Kate co-founded Myopia Profile with Dr Paul Gifford; the world-leading educational platform on childhood myopia management. After 13 years of clinical practice ownership, Kate now works full time on Myopia Profile.

Back to all articles

Enormous thanks to our visionary sponsors

Myopia Profile’s growth into a world leading platform has been made possible through the support of our visionary sponsors, who share our mission to improve children’s vision care worldwide. Click on their logos to learn about how these companies are innovating and developing resources with us to support you in managing your patients with myopia.